Some Harsh Concepts Evaluated

A gang of thugs break open a locked gate and march onto private property, shouting and gesturing to some surprised landowners who are enjoying the piece of land that they have bought and paid taxes for. The landowners produce legally-owned firearms from their bought-and-paid- for home, and warn the arrogant, vicious, mouthy intruders (the opposite of “peaceful demonstrators”) to leave. In return, not only are they threatened with injury and murder, but the officials elected to protect the legal landowners throw the full weight of the law at the aggrieved couple.

Have all of the Ten Commandments been cancelled? Has “Thou shalt not steal” or “Thou shalt not covet” been set aside? Apparently, the invaders and the elected officials think so. Furthermore, it is apparent that, according to this “woke” generation, the couple must abrogate their adherence to the principles of the Bible (Exodus 20) and the Constitution (2^nd Amendment).

Let us lay aside for the moment the concepts contained in the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments) and the U.S. Constitution (the document that has supposedly turned certain people into “social justice warriors”). Let us turn to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Jesus told many parables about the Kingdom of Heaven – many of which involved rights to property. In one particular parable recorded by St. Luke, Jesus told a story that is replete with startling details: “A man of noble birth” was declared king of a far distant country. He decided to test his servants while he was away claiming his inheritance. He gave high-value coins (a mina was equivalent to 100 days’ wages) to ten different servants, with the simple instruction to “conduct business” until the master returned.

** News flash: Calling someone a “master” or a “king” was not politically incorrect in those days. In fact, there has been a time in America where we were not badgered at every turn to “watch what we say.” As an example, please note that Don Lemon stated that Jesus Christ was “not perfect.” How amazing! Is Don Lemon “perfect” (and how does he know what perfection is)? I would venture to say that “not perfect” means that Jesus Christ the Savior of Mankind – Who died for our sins – is a WHOLE lot better than… well, you-know-who. But that topic is for a subsequent blog.**

Back to Jesus’ story. Now someone in the kingdom was really miffed that this rich “man of noble birth” was not only in charge of a large enough estate to have thousands in silver (the equivalent of the ten minas in the story), but soon he would indeed have vastly more influence, having two centers of power. These inhabitants of the land actually hated this man for his nobility, his wealth, his generosity, and his power. (Do these disgruntled “citizens” remind you of anyone today?) They thought that in the World of Power, their voices counted, and that they were entitled to change the political scene, without knowing anything except hatred for a man who had done nothing – except lead them to prosperity. I won’t spoil the ending, but  -- spoiler alert!! -- these “woke” individuals didn’t do so well.

Here’s where the story gets really interesting: it has two separate conclusions. The first one involves the master’s response to the profit/loss ledgers that the ten servants turned over once the newly-crowned king returned to his first estate. We know that at least two of the servants demonstrated good business sense, and the master rewarded them well – even though, please note, they did not all gain the same profits for their master. Apparently, he did not care one iota that they had differing sums in their ledgers. He saw that his chosen investors (all but one) were creative, helpful, diligent, and righteous. They did all their hard work for their master, not knowing how (or if) he intended to reward them. But he did – handsomely! (Read all about their rewards in Luke 19:16-19.) 

Of course, there is a down side; one servant was a lazy lout and could not even be bothered to make a trip to the Town Bank to at least get some interest for his master. And the master was angry – so angry that the servant was publicly shamed and deprived of whatever bonus the master was thinking of giving him. Remember that these servants, though their names are not given to us, were well-known to their master, who chose them in the first place to “show their mettle.”

OK, and then here’s the part that throws everyone scrambling to their safe spaces – if there is such a thing in the Kingdom of Heaven. The master is justifiably angry at the treason of his subjects (who not only tried to block his return, but attempted to stage a coupe at his new kingdom).

Now I would like to remind you of several things: These lawless subjects did not give any reason for their hatred of the “man of noble birth.” As I have related before, there is every reason to believe the master ruled fairly. When the unfruitful servant was chastised in front of the others, they fearlessly challenged their master’s judgment. If they really believed that he was “harsh” (as the lazy lout claimed), they would have feared speaking out. And yet the master did not lash out at them; he explained in very real terms that those who don’t use what they have been freely given will lose all.

In addition, hatred is not a reason for disorder. Who did the disloyal subjects suggest would reign instead of their master? Another servant? One of their own number? The master expected obedience to the rule he had set down; he refused to reward incompetence.

And there is more. At the end of this parable, Jesus quotes the master as saying, “And these enemies of mine who were unwilling for me to rule over them, bring them here and slay them in front of me” (verse 27). More than one person has sought to explain away this apparently “insensitive” detail that Jesus uttered.

But He uttered the complete truth. Those who fight God and try to pursue hatred and lawlessness and chaos are doomed. They will not be able to hide from their maker. And just as the master had complete control over his two centers of power, God has the last word both in this life and in the next. You will not be able to storm the gates of Heaven and proclaim your “right” to be there. You cannot threaten or intimidate His servants in Heaven, for they are beyond your power to control. You cannot insist that you can occupy the perfect home of God while sin stains your soul.

At the final judgment, God will be the only Power there is.

Information for you from the Berean Study Bible:

The Parable of the Ten Minas – Luke 19: 11-26
(Matthew 25:14-30)

11While the people were listening to this, Jesus proceeded to tell them a parable, because He was near Jerusalem and they thought the kingdom of God would appear imminently. 12So He said, “A man of noble birth went to a distant country to lay claim to his kingship and then return. 13Beforehand, he called ten of his servants and gave them ten minas. ‘Conduct business with this until I return,’ he said.

14But his subjects hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We do not want this man to rule over us.’

15When he returned from procuring his kingship, he summoned the servants to whom he had given the money, to find out what each one had earned.

16The first servant came forward and said, ‘Master, your mina has produced ten more minas.’

17His master replied, ‘Well done, good servant! Because you have been faithful in a very small matter, you shall have authority over ten cities.’

18The second servant came and said, ‘Master, your mina has made five minas.’

19And to this one he said, ‘You shall have authority over five cities.’

20Then another servant came and said, ‘Master, here is your mina, which I have laid away in a piece of cloth. 21 For I was afraid of you, because you are a harsh man. You withdraw what you did not deposit and reap what you did not sow.’

22His master replied, ‘You wicked servant, I will judge you by your own words. So you knew that I am a harsh man, withdrawing what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow? 23Why then did you not deposit my money in the bank, and upon my return I could have collected it with interest?’

24Then he told those standing by, ‘Take the mina from him and give it to the one who has ten minas.’

25‘Master,’ they said, ‘he already has ten!’

26He replied, ‘I tell you that everyone who has will be given more; but the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him. 27And these enemies of mine who were unwilling for me to rule over them, bring them here and slay them in front of me.’”

Three Liberals’ Take on Interpreting the Bible (Part 3)

“Once more unto the breach, dear friends!” Henry V said to his troops at Harfleur, according to William Shakespeare. It literally means “Let’s have another go!” Now, I promise that this will be the last installment of my critique of the Three Bible Scholars (TBS’s) – unless you want more! (After all, there’s a LOT more of the Bible that they missed on their first round of Public Bible Studies.) In a way, this installment is the hardest one to do, because Jesus actually uses capitalism as a positive example, instead of denouncing it for the evil, vicious, ungodly activity that every Democratic Senator (like Booker and Warren) and popular preacher (like Rev. Barber) know it is.

Here is the passage from Matthew’s Gospel chapter 25 that we will be discussing:

The Parable of the Talents

¹⁴ “For [God’s Kingdom] will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. ¹⁵ To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. ¹⁶ He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. ¹⁷ So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. ¹⁸ But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master’s money. ¹⁹ Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. ²⁰ And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ ²¹ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ ²² And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ ²³ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ ²⁴ He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, ²⁵ so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ ²⁶ But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? ²⁷ Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. ²⁸ So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. ²⁹ For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. ³⁰ And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’”

***

Now, before anyone faints from the sheer audacity of Jesus Christ to “favor” rich, capitalist owner / occupiers[1] (or shall we call this figure a “corporation”?), let me hasten to explain the following:

1)    According to our TBS’s, Jesus only meant for us to read or hear the passage that follows this one (Matthew 25: 31 – 46) – that is, the passage concerning the Last Judgement, which this blog examined in Part 1 of this series.

2)    We should avoid interpreting the word “talent” in this passage as being involved in any free market endeavors. That would be strictly against the Moral Code of the TBS’s. (“Money can only be used as handouts.”)

3)    The Uh-O who distributed the talents was obviously one of those “capitalist oppressors”; it may have something to do with the “gathering where you scattered no seed” bit. In any case, any other interpretation would make it appear that God actually approves of the ownership of property, a free enterprise system, bartering, the gaining of interest (the Stock Market?), etc. (And then we’d have another problem with the Eighth Commandment: “Thou shalt not steal.”) Notice, too, how abusive the Uh-O is towards the frightened, overly-protective possessor of the single talent. At one point in the narrative, the Uh-O berates the poor, unlucky non-trader; later, he even evicts him into the “outer darkness” (verse 30). Gee… in light of the TBS’s claim to possess the “moral side of history,”[2] shouldn’t Jesus edit His parable a bit?

4)    But, wait! There’s more! At the very end of the parable, the Uh-O informs his servants thus: “For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away” (verse 29). How utterly shocking and undemocratic! How non-liberal these words are!

Now pause for a second to consider # 4 before we go on. Don’t the words that Jesus puts in the Uh-O’s mouth sound like the exact opposite of what Booker, Warren, and Barber are advocating? They oppose the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh as the next Supreme Court Judge precisely because he – like the Uh-O in Jesus’ parable – refuses to decide cases ahead of time based on the “hungry / thirsty / stranger (alien) / sick / imprisoned” labels discussed in Parts 1 & 2 of this series.

My, my!! What have we learned from a non-PC reading of the 25^th chapter of Matthew’s Gospel? 1) God does not demand that we share with those too lazy to prepare for themselves. 2) Jesus won’t let us into His Party if we’re not His followers, and only He – not the Democratic Party or any other political organization – can open the door once it’s shut. 3) We are each given resources from God (as He determines, not the Democratic Party), and He holds us accountable for using them to the best of our abilities. 4) The punishment for failure to “look to these matters” is severe (and not determined by Democrats).

It appears that the TBS’s have a problem of Biblical proportions… If I were Booker, Warren, and Barber, I’d have a genuine heart-to-heart with our Lord and Savior – and initiate a sincere and open-minded study of God’s Word – before they begin any heart-to-heart “discussions” with Brett Kavanaugh. It might just save them from a trip into “outer darkness.”

---

[1] Or, if you prefer, the “Uh-O’s”

[2] O’Neil, Tyler. “Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker Host Bible Event against Trump Supreme Court Pick” PJ Media, July 25, 2018. https://pjmedia.com/faith/bernie-sanders-elizabeth-warren-cory-booker-host-bible-event-against-trump-supreme-court-pick/